The Sand Myth"He might have to fight in the desert"The MythDuring and after World War Two, a very common reason for circumcising in Australia and New Zealand was The story has been elaborated to "a high-ranking medical officer found the pain so intolerable that he circumcised himself".
Not quite "complete authenticity": adult circumcision would require a pair of scissors, not a scalpel. This "vignette" was written nearly 40 years after the event. That story seems to be the basis of this one:
New Zealand doctors interviewed in the 1960s often mentioned wartime hygiene problems with troops, and one noted that circumcision peaked in popularity after each World War. It was still being offered as a reason in Australia in 1964. One of the authors of the Royal Australasian College of Physicians' 2002 policy paper mentioned it as a reason. The same claim has been extended backward in time to the Israelites, providing a medical explanation for a long-term custom. The story resurfaced in the US after Operation Desert Storm. In 1941 there was a 70-bed tent hospital for Venereal Diseases, near Maadi in Egypt. One veteran, now 91, told me it was known as "the Lube Bay" (lube, he said, being Egyptian for penis [this word was unknown to an Egyptian woman at the 6ISGI], and there, he said, men with infections caused by desert sand were circumcised - and, he said, in 1940 the order went out that any men who were not already circumcised, had to be. The RefutationWith an estimated 5000 to 17,000 intact New Zealand men in Egypt, putting them out of action for up to two weeks seems unlikely. The doctors had enough on their hands with up to 680 VD cases per day - and those wounded in battle. The official medical war history is silent, not stinting discussion of VD or much more minor ailments including tinea (athlete's foot) and haemorrhoids (piles). In connection with gonorrhoea it mentions measure taken "...to prevent symbiotic organisms from the prepuce invading the inflamed urethra..." - strongly suggesting that prepuces were left on the men who had them. A nurse wrote:
In such conditions it would have been madness to create wounds.
So one circumcision led to several defections. No compulsion, and a preventive measure ready to hand. (Thompson implies that "uncircumcised" New Zealanders were already a rarity, but the story makes it clear they were not.) The official history says skin inflammations were a hazard of desert warfare, and they were exacerbated by the very fine sand, but it makes no mention of the foreskin or preputial cavity as a site, nor of circumcision as a treatment. On the contrary, it records that damaging the skin was avoided, as was performing surgery that was not "...urgent or else offered the prospect of permanent relief of symptoms sufficient to enable a man to be retained in useful employment overseas." The likelihood is that the men our veteran saw - and he accurately described the sequelae of circumcision - (swelling, discolouration) had been circumcised to treat soft chancre (a Sexually Transmitted Disease), or balanitis exacerbated by phimosis. Another living veteran of the campain is reportedly intact and has a photograph of a group of men in the campaign, naked, many intact. New Zealand's 28th Batallion was entirely of Mäori who left and returned virtually all intact, after serving bravely in the African desert. As an experiment, three intact men have tried leaving sand (beach sand, admittedly, not desert) under their foreskins for days at a time. No infection or even discomfort resulted. Some pro-circumcisionists have gone so far as to claim that men of the Germans' Afrika Korps were circumcised for the same reason. Not many members survive, but one surviving person was in a good position to know:
Manfred Rommel was the son of Field-marshal Erwin Rommel, "the Desert Fox". He was 14 in October 1944 when his father was forced to take poison for plotting against Hitler. Naturally, he was in touch with his father's former troops for the rest of his life. In spite of its want of substance, the sand story was a powerful reason to circumcise in New Zealand in wartime and afterwards.
I'm a retired Navy dentist and spent most of my time with the
Marines, off & on 1971-2005. Have been through numerous Chemical,
Nuclear and Biological Warfare classes. Plus a few of the Navy's on-line
correspondence courses.
In one of the class courses we saw a training film in a pre-WWII
Australian study on 'volunteers.' It dealt with blistering agents
like those used in WWI. There were a lot of chemical burns under
the prepuces. They were preparing for a new war by preparing for
the last war.
In one correspondence Course on the treatment of chemical injuries,
they mention chemical burns from blistering agents in those
uncircumcised.
For my Desert Storm recall I was sent to Marine Corps Air Station
El Toro for four months where there were a lot of Warthog crews and supporting
personnel - over 3000 at this base. We did exams on all
returning personnel. Lots of sand stories - nothing about this
sand-penis thing. But, OK, I work on another opening.
Then I immediately went to Camp Pendleton for another three months where we out-processed a lot of tankers. Lot of sand in everything, never
heard a sand-penis story there either.
For this thing going on now my group was one of the first recalled
to Iraq. I couldn't go. Had a medical classification that
wouldn't let me go overseas my last 7 years. Anyway, my buddies
that I had served with, some for 14 years, had a lot of sand
stories but no sand-penis thing.
No stories of the sand-penis thing from the M.D.s at either base.
In WWII the efficient Germans didn't circumcise.
These guys probably put their Little Dude where it didn't belong.
Hell, officers don't get Venereal Disease. They get an
undiagnosable, non-differientiated bladder infection.
I think this sand-penis thing is packing the sand in another
orifice.
- Richard L. Matteoli, DDS
External link: Darby, Robert: The riddle of the sands: circumcision, history, and myth, Journal of the New Zealand Medical Association, 15-July-2005, Vol 118 No 1218.
|
Related pages:
Back to the Intactivism index page.